Comments on: Assignment 3 Christoph Eckrich https://courses.ideate.cmu.edu/60-223/f2017/assignment-3/ 60-223 Fall 2017 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 00:08:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8.24 By: jjh1@andrew.cmu.edu https://courses.ideate.cmu.edu/60-223/f2017/assignment-3/#comment-161 Tue, 03 Oct 2017 04:27:50 +0000 https://courses.ideate.cmu.edu/60-223/f2017/?p=249#comment-161 I appreciated that your project had a high level of craft to the presentation, which made the experience of interacting with it more engaging. I think the use of the IR sensor was also smart in relation to your intentions because it seemed to engage with farther distances better than I’ve seen other sensors like the photo resistor do. It was exciting to see something that appeared as inanimate react to even my approach- this unexpected twist is what made the experience so fun.

]]> By: ianf@andrew.cmu.edu https://courses.ideate.cmu.edu/60-223/f2017/assignment-3/#comment-141 Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:53:25 +0000 https://courses.ideate.cmu.edu/60-223/f2017/?p=249#comment-141 V cool. I feel like it would lead to a more meaningful response if the IR sensor were on top, which would start to imply an eagerness to touch the approaching hand or maybe even an intention to hurt anyone that comes close to it. This kind of direct interaction enables the project to go in a number of different directions that would more effectively convey some representation of the human condition – and it would probably be a lot more fun to interact with!

A+ project though

]]>