Reading 1

I was drawn to the discussion of early photogrammetry used to take measurements of a space or building from the photo and photographic setup, and —kind of tangentially — the idea of photographs unintentionally measuring something which may not have been the subject. Although photogrammetry in the form of 3d scanning is pretty commonplace now, I think it would be interesting to take the traditional approach of mapping an environment from a flat photo, and the idea of “…the ability to measure [appearing] to be a useful but unintended byproduct of a photographic image made for other reasons…” (34.) 

A photograph could be made for representative purposes, while also being repurposed in the most abstract sense of photogrammetry where a subject is measured by their environment, vice-versa, or a secret third thing. 

Latticed Window with camera obscura– an example of a photograph which unintentionally functions as a measurement :

Early photogrammetric measurement process:

Completely unrelated document that feels visually similair to the photogrammetry above:

Looking Outwards 3

I went super basic with Polycam, an app that easily allows you to make 3d/lidar scans of objects and rooms (upgraded version allows for different file type exports along with capability for larger scans.) There are in-app purchases, but they’re easy to avoid. Here’s a broken scan I made

Looking Outwards 2

I knew immediately I was going to talk about Joe Pease with this prompt because I went through a minor obsession phase with his work. His work is pretty much entirely illusory video edits and overlays. My understanding is that he takes pretty average stock-photo-passing-video and overlays a set of them to create false interaction between the subjects. At some point, false camera movement and grain are added which makes the fake interactions look more realistic, along with adding a CCTV or candid quality to the piece. I’m going to link to his Instagram for the videos which are better than the lazy still I’m including:

https://www.instagram.com/joepease?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=ZDNlZDc0MzIxNw==

 

 

Looking Outwards 1

I found myself really interested in both the portable scanner and the barcode scanner, which I think is because they have similar qualities to the way they transform information. The portable scanner presents an opportunity to capture and flatten textures found in the wild, and subsequently recontextualize them. The barcode scanner presents the opportunity to flatten an object by reducing it to the number sequence on its barcode (assuming it has a barcode.) This might be kind of an intense proposal for something that quite literally just came to mind, but I’m imagining using the scanner to capture textures and create new forms of camouflage (whether that’s wearable to humans or a means of hiding an object or animal.) Again, the barcode scanner has similar possibilities. I’m imagining replacing objects with their scanned barcode or applying a barcode to an unrelated thing/person/etc… and using it as a fake ID-ing system. That one feels blander than new camo.

I’m including a video of a portable scanner in action. Forgive the fact that it’s a TikTok and the end involves self promo by the creator.

@andreyazizov

Exploring w/ a portable scanner, textures & assets available now! 💫 #graphicdesign

♬ MTA x Aline by dnldjackson22 – dnldjackson22