Day 10: (Oct 1) Demo 5 Critique¶
Notes for 2018-10-01. See also the Fall 2018 Calendar.
Agenda¶
- Administrative
- Who else has received their FBI results?
- Each student will need to write to act153@andrew.cmu.edu to get a copy of their PATCH results and forward it to me.
- Any particular topics on which you’d like more instruction or code samples?
- In-class
- Demo 5 review.
- As before, each pair will be responsible for leading the critique of another pair.
- This time, no advance explanations: the responders will test the device without hearing the intent of the authors.
- Everyone will formulate one observation about their experience of deception and write it down silently.
- Responders, please then simply describe what you see in the work.
- The authors will then pose an specific, unresolved question which would help further development.
- The responders will then ask neutral questions which may help reveal the work. Please refrain from making specific suggestions at this point; there are an infinite number of alternative decisions which could have been made, so just generating options isn’t as helpful as elucidating and developing the author’s underlying thought process.
- We will then follow up with a short technical critique; authors will describe their implementation strategy and identify unresolved problems.
- The following prompt questions may help spark your inquiries:
- Is it tricky? Does the deception work? Is it repeatable?
- Whom does the deception benefit?
- Where is the analog sensor? Is the continuous process centered on sensor interpretation, feedback, or something else?
- Demo 5 review.