General Expectations
There are a few essential things you can do to ensure that you receive a totally respectable grade in this course:
- Be respectful of our social space. Make space for others.
- Be present. Show up to all of the course sessions, on time.
- Be responsible. Communicate with your professors and clean up after yourself.
- Be diligent. Submit all of the Deliverables, on time.
- Follow instructions: do all parts of the Deliverables, paying careful attention to seemingly trivial requirements (such as categorizing your blog posts correctly, formatting your code properly, giving your blog post a title in the requested format etc.).
- Ask for help. If you don’t know how/where/what, ask for help.
- Be curious. If you don’t understand something, start with curiosity rather than judgment. Curiosity and criticality go hand in hand.
There are also some things you can do to earn a really great grade in this course:
- Make interesting, novel, provocative work that’s well-crafted, and document it well.
- Be fearless and resourceful about getting the assistance you need.
- Help your classmates when they’re stuck.
- Make helpful contributions to discussions.
Follow Your Passion
This is art sqool. With very rare exceptions (we’ll be clear), we will always prefer that you make the assignment interesting to you — if necessary, by creatively bending the rules or re-interpreting the assignment. Our assignments are starting-points, prompts and propositions. Think beyond them.
Notwithstanding the above, you will always be expected to fulfill basic expectations in regards to deliverables and documentation. Did you include an image of your project? Did you write the requested narrative? These expectations will be clearly listed.
Policies for Late Work
When you submit work late, you miss the chance to share, discuss and get feedback on your work which are essential affordances of this class.
At times this semester, your creative projects may be evaluated by outside experts who review your work in class or online. At other times, your work may be reviewed in class in a critique by your peers. If your assignment is not uploaded and documented online by the time those persons do their reviews, then your work is officially considered “too late” and will not be able to earn meaningful credit.
For minor projects, such as Looking Outwards blog posts: These should be uploaded and completed by the time that we get around to grading them, which is usually a day or two after their stated due date. If not, we reserve the right to assign partial or zero credit to them.
- Generally we grade work a few days after the due date. We offer no precise details about this.
- Projects submitted after critiques (or, after external critics have performed their evaluations) may get a one-letter grade deduction, depending on circumstances, and may not receive written feedback, or may only receive significantly attenuated written feedback.
Rubrics for Open-Ended Projects
The purpose of our open-ended Projects is to provide well-circumscribed opportunities for you to make creative work. Generally the Project prompts will invite you to explore a specific conceptual theme or set of technological workflows, but, unless stated otherwise, there is no correct solution, and no specific requirement for how to implement your idea. A Project also asks not just for a creative solution, but also for some creativity in defining and approaching the problem. It is expected that your Projects will be documented and published on our WordPress website.
The open-ended Projects will be evaluated according to the following considerations:
- Curiosity: Are you asking questions as you work?
- Tenacity: When facing difficulties are you learning and adapting rather than compromising or giving up on your original goals?
- Execution: Are you crafting with purpose, precision, and attention?
- Inventiveness: Are you discovering/exploring methods outside the obvious and predictable?
- Fulfillment: Did you meet all of the requested supporting criteria (such as providing scans of sketches, categorizing your blog post correctly, documenting your process, etc.)?
With Projects, it may not matter how much time a student spent making it. You may sometimes observe a very quickly-executed solution which succeeds because of its strong concept. Usually, however, the quality of a project is rewarded by extra attention to its craft.
Projects always have a list of supporting requirements. These are straightforward to fulfill, but if you fail to meet these, you will have points deducted. Nearly every Project assignment will ask you to:
- Create a unique blog post for your project, on our course website.
- Make sure your blog post is titled and categorized as requested.
- Embed your interactive project into the post, if this is technologically possible.
- Include a static documentation image of your project, such as a screenshot or photograph.
- Include scans or photos of any notebook sketches, if you have them.
- In the case of dynamic work, include dynamic documentation too: embed a YouTube, Vimeo demonstrating your project. Often, an animated GIF will be required.
- Write 100-200 words about your project, describing its development process. In your writing, include some critical reflection and analysis of your project: In what ways did you succeed, and in what ways could it be better?
Related to our course policies on Academic Integrity, you must also:
- Name any other students from whom you received advice or help.
If you had collaborators, explain how the work was distributed among the collaborators. - Cite and link to the sources for any code, external libraries, or other media (e.g. photographs, soundtracks, source images) which you used in your Project. Citing your sources is super important, folks. Err on the side of generosity.
Hey. Not every project you make can or will be a work of brilliance. It’s OK. In this class, it is much more important to submit work on time than to freeze up, because your work isn’t perfect or mind-blowingly original. We are in school to exercise our creative muscles. Do the work and be kind to yourself as you learn. And then get some sleep.
Rubrics for “Looking Outwards” Reports
There may be a number of Looking Outwards assignments this semester. The purpose of “Looking Outwards” Assignments (LO) reports is for you to become familiar with the landscape of contemporary practices, and to begin to articulate your own set of interests and concerns within that landscape. To that end, your Looking Outwards reports will form a kind of “research diary”. You may be occasionally asked to discuss or present a project you reported about in a Looking Outwards assignment.
LO’s are given a grade of Pass (1) or Fail (0). Decent reports submitted by the stated deadline will pass. Missing, overdue and/or manifestly shoddy work will fail. Your professor is attentive to the evident care you put into Looking Outwards reports. Good LO’s will meet the following criteria:
- Your writing is careful, considered, and critical.
- You have written approximately 100-200 words on the project.
- You include an embedded image or video of the documented project.
- You explain the project, and make an effort to critique it.
- You have published the above in a blog post, on time.
- Your Looking Outwards blog post is well-titled and correctly categorized.
Grading Summary
Your final grade is derived from your assignments, less any demerits due to unexcused absences.
- Project 1 (Typology Machine): 30%
- Project 2 (Person in Time): 30%
- Project 3 (Capstone Project): 30%
- Other Deliverables and Participation: 10%
Projects will be graded with scores of A,B,C,D, or F, as follows, and will be evaluated using the “Evaluation Guidelines” rubric shown below:
- A (90% – 100%): You made something very good [i.e. creative excellence]
- B (80% – 89%): You made something that works [i.e. satisfactory; correct and timely fulfillment of all requirements]
- C (70% – 79%): You tried to make something [i.e. needs improvement, incomplete]
- D (60% – 69%): You did not try [i.e. unacceptable work, does not fulfill any requirements completely]
- F (59% or less): You did not show up [i.e. no credit]
(This rubric chart is from Prof. Mark Baskinger in the CMU School of Design.)